Click on a term to reduce result list
The result list below will be reduced to the selected search terms. The terms are generated from the titles, abstracts and STW thesaurus of publications by the respective author.
72 records from EconBiz based on author Name
1. Review of the Significant Market Power (SMP) guidelines : executive summary
abstractThis Study provides support to the European Commission in its revision of the 2002 guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power for electronic communications networks and services ("2002 SMP Guidelines"). The main issue explored both from an economic and a legal perspective is the concept of joint SMP of telecoms operators for the purpose of ex ante regulation in the electronic communications sector. The Study also analyses developments in the concept of market definition and the finding of individual SMP as well as implications of the proposed European Electronic Communications Code for the market analysis process. In addition, it covers all the sections of the 2002 SMP Guidelines. The analysis is based on a review of competition case-law, detailed case studies of relevant market analyses conducted by NRAs, the analysis of economic evidence and the results of an interactive workshop with BEREC and NRAs, in which various hypothetical market scenarios were considered. The conclusions of the Study regarding joint SMP are based on general competition law principles, drawing in particular from the ECJ's findings in Airtours and Impala. It takes into account particularities of the electronic communications sector and the extensive experience of market regulation by NRAs in order to suggest the main steps that could be taken by NRAs when assessing whether a market is characterised by joint SMP, and the evidence that could be presented, respectively, in the case there is no pre-existing regulation and where such regulation exists and might affect wholesale and retail outcomes.
Godlovitch, Ilsa; Stumpf, Ulrich; Sörries, Bernd; Lucidi, Stefano; Gantumur, Tseveen; Alexiadis, Peter; Negro, Matteo; Zaman, Rakhal; Streel, Alexandre de;2018
Availability: Link
2. Review of the Significant Market Power (SMP) guidelines : annex
Godlovitch, Ilsa; Stumpf, Ulrich; Sörries, Bernd; Lucidi, Stefano; Gantumur, Tseveen; Alexiadis, Peter; Negro, Matteo; Zaman, Rakhal; Streel, Alexandre de;2018
Availability: Link
3. Review of the Significant Market Power (SMP) guidelines : final report
abstractThis Study provides support to the European Commission in its revision of the 2002 guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power for electronic communications networks and services ("2002 SMP Guidelines"). The main issue explored both from an economic and a legal perspective is the concept of joint SMP of telecoms operators for the purpose of ex ante regulation in the electronic communications sector. The Study also analyses developments in the concept of market definition and the finding of individual SMP as well as implications of the proposed European Electronic Communications Code for the market analysis process. In addition, it covers all the sections of the 2002 SMP Guidelines. The analysis is based on a review of competition case-law, detailed case studies of relevant market analyses conducted by NRAs, the analysis of economic evidence and the results of an interactive workshop with BEREC and NRAs, in which various hypothetical market scenarios were considered. The conclusions of the Study regarding joint SMP are based on general competition law principles, drawing in particular from the ECJ's findings in Airtours and Impala. It takes into account particularities of the electronic communications sector and the extensive experience of market regulation by NRAs in order to suggest the main steps that could be taken by NRAs when assessing whether a market is characterised by joint SMP, and the evidence that could be presented, respectively, in the case there is no pre-existing regulation and where such regulation exists and might affect wholesale and retail outcomes.
Godlovitch, Ilsa; Stumpf, Ulrich; Sörries, Bernd; Lucidi, Stefano; Gantumur, Tseveen; Alexiadis, Peter; Negro, Matteo; Zaman, Rakhal; Streel, Alexandre de;2018
Availability: Link
4. Kundenbindungsansätze im deutschen TK-Markt im Lichte der Regulierung
Monti, Alessandro; Schäfer, Ralf; Lucidi, Stefano; Stumpf, Ulrich;2013
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability: Link Link
5. Regulatorische Ansätze zur Vermeidung wettbewerbswidriger Wirkungen von Triple-Play-Produkten
Lucidi, Stefano; Stumpf, Ulrich;2012
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability: Link Link
6. Neue Verfahren für Frequenzauktionen : konzeptionelle Ansätze und internationale Erfahrungen
Nett, Lorenz; Stumpf, Ulrich;2011
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability: Link Link Link Link Link
7. Symmetrische Regulierung : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen im neuen EU-Rechtsrahmen
Nett, Lorenz; Stumpf, Ulrich;2011
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability: Link Link Link Link
8. Regulatory, in particular access, regimes for network investment models in Europe : executive summary
abstractIn this study, we seek to understand Europe's future needs for high bandwidth connectivity, the business models for investment in new networks, and how regulation may impact the business case for deployment of very high capacity networks as well as choice and value in services for end-users. We also consider the implications of different governance models for access regulation at EU level. On the basis of this analysis, we evaluate the current access regime and the associated institutional set-up, and present recommendations in these areas for the reform of the EU framework for electronic communications. Key conclusions are that the current framework has been effective in delivering competition in broadband, but has not levelled up the standard of very high capacity broadband in Europe to match EU and international best practice benchmarks, and has not delivered a single market for services to enterprises. The lack of binding Decisions on remedies and complex institutional processes may be partly responsible. We recommend an increased focus on infrastructure competition, geographically targeted regulation and co-investment within an expanded market analysis process, as well as a common approach for business wholesale products. A reformed BEREC could serve to support consistent application of the rules.
Godlovitch, Ilsa; Lemstra, Wolter; Pennings, Christoph; Neumann, Karl-Heinz; Streel, Alexandre de; Stronzik, Marcus; Stumpf, Ulrich; Baldacchino, Vincent; Kroon, Peter; Lucidi, Stefano; Gantumur, Tseveen; Plueckebaum, Thomas; Chaillou, Valérie; Peijl, Sebastiaan van den;2016
Availability: Link
9. Regulatory, in particular access, regimes for network investment models in Europe : final report
abstractIn this study, we seek to understand Europe's future needs for high bandwidth connectivity, the business models for investment in new networks, and how regulation may impact the business case for deployment of very high capacity networks as well as choice and value in services for end-users. We also consider the implications of different governance models for access regulation at EU level. On the basis of this analysis, we evaluate the current access regime and the associated institutional set-up, and present recommendations in these areas for the reform of the EU framework for electronic communications. Key conclusions are that the current framework has been effective in delivering competition in broadband, but has not levelled up the standard of very high capacity broadband in Europe to match EU and international best practice benchmarks, and has not delivered a single market for services to enterprises. The lack of binding Decisions on remedies and complex institutional processes may be partly responsible. We recommend an increased focus on infrastructure competition, geographically targeted regulation and co-investment within an expanded market analysis process, as well as a common approach for business wholesale products. A reformed BEREC could serve to support consistent application of the rules.
Godlovitch, Ilsa; Lemstra, Wolter; Pennings, Christoph; Neumann, Karl-Heinz; Streel, Alexandre de; Stronzik, Marcus; Stumpf, Ulrich; Baldacchino, Vincent; Kroon, Peter; Lucidi, Stefano; Gantumur, Tseveen; Plueckebaum, Thomas; Chaillou, Valérie; Peijl, Sebastiaan van den;2016
Availability: Link
10. NGA-Infrastrukturen, Märkte und Regulierungsregime in ausgewählten Ländern
Gantumur, Tseveen; Stumpf, Ulrich;2016
Type: Working Paper;
Availability:
