Click on a term to reduce result list
The result list below will be reduced to the selected search terms. The terms are generated from the titles, abstracts and STW thesaurus of publications by the respective author.
101 records from EconBiz based on author Name
1. The increasing geoeconomic usage of the Single Market for financial services
abstractThe Single Market in financial services has increasingly been used for geoeconomic purposes, that range from incipient geoeconomic use to outward weaponization of the Single Market in finance. This geoeconomic usage can be illustrated in a few salient cases that involve the EU and other majorjurisdictions: (1) the post-2008 crisis transatlantic tug-of-war; (2) the Brexit negotiations; and (3) during the full-scale war in Ukraine. We adopt four metaphors to characterize the geoeconomic deployment of the Single Market and the EU’s geoeconomic actorness. These are shield and sword; testudo; phalanx and scattered comman-dos. A mix of external and internal factors accounts for this pattern, for instance, changes to the internati-onal economic and political system as well as the development of the EU’s ability to deploy its Single Market geoeconomically
Quaglia, Lucia; Verdun, Amy;2023
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability:
Link Link 2. An introduction: "macroeconomic policy coordination and domestic politics : policy coordination in the EU from the European Semester to the Covid-19 crisis"
D'Erman, Valerie J.; Verdun, Amy;2022
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link Link
Citations: 14 (based on OpenCitations)
3. The European Semester in the North and in the South : domestic politics and the salience of EU-induced wage reform in different growth models
D'Erman, Valerie J.; Schulz, Daniel F.; Verdun, Amy; Zagermann, Dennis;2022
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link Link
Citations: 11 (based on OpenCitations)
4. The European Semester as Goldilocks : macroeconomic policy coordination and the Recovery and Resilience Facility
Vanhercke, Bart; Verdun, Amy;2022
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link Link
Citations: 35 (based on OpenCitations)
5. The geoeconomics of the single market for financial services
Quaglia, Lucia; Verdun, Amy;2024
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link Link
6. From the European semester to the recovery and resilience facility : some social actors are (not) resurfacing
abstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, major financial support has been pledged to Member States. This funding draws on the EU’s multiannual financial framework and the ‘NextGenerationEU’ with, at its core, the temporary ‘Recovery and Resilience Facility’ (RRF). While some reporting templates have been newly invented, others are linked to the European Semester. This report examines how and why the Semester became part of the governance of the RRF. We also ask to what extent this new set-up has changed the power balance among key EU actors (for example, financial and economic actors versus institutional social affairs actors)? Drawing on extensive document analysis and 32 semi-structured elite interviews, the findings suggest that initially, due to the crisis (and desire for fast action), there was a serious risk that EU institutional social actors were losing the prominence they had previously earned. They gradually reclaimed their position as the immediacy of the crisis subsided and a longer-term focus emerged. EU civil servants also engaged with social partners on both sides of industry, even though it is questionable whether this consultation has been really meaningful. EU civil society organisations (CSOs) have been largely sidelined in the RRF process; and likewise in most Member States, consultation with domestic stakeholders (both social partners and CSOs) has remained insufficient by any standard. The European Parliament was reasonably successful in securing its substantive impact during the RRF negotiations. But it has since failed to insert itself into the approval and assessment procedures applicable to the EU’s recovery programme.
Vanhercke, Bart; Verdun, Amy; Atanasova, Angelina; Spasova, Slavina; Thomson, Malcolm;2021
Type: Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature; Arbeitspapier; Working Paper;
Availability:
Link Link 7. The political economy of Europe’s future and identity : integration in crisis mode
Bongardt, Annette; Torres, Francisco S.;2023
Type: Amtliche Publikation; Amtsdrucksache; Amtliche Druckschrift; Amtliche Veröffentlichung; Offizielle Publikation; Regierungsveröffentlichung; Amtsdruckschrift; Aufsatzsammlung; Beiträge
Availability:
Link Link 8. The increasing geoeconomic usage of the Single Market for financial services
Quaglia, Lucia; Verdun, Amy;2023
Type: Article;
Availability:
9. European Union governance and policy-making : a Canadian perspective
abstract"European Union Governance and Policy-Making introduces the politics of the European Union (EU) to a student audience. The book is explicitly focused on students enrolled in universities in Canada, or other non-EU countries, and builds on their academic background. Chapters cover the political and legal system of the EU, theories of European integration, core EU policies such as the Single Market, its single currency, migration policy, EU enlargement, as well as pressing issues facing the further development of European integration. This second edition has been comprehensively revised and updated to include a discussion of Brexit, the European Green Deal, COVID-19, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Written by leading Canadian scholars in the field of European integration, as well as international experts with teaching experience in Canadian universities, this textbook leverages the comparison to Canada and its federal system to help students understand what is unique about the European Union."
Verdun, Amy; Hurrelmann, Achim; Brunet-Jailly, Emmanuel;2023
Type: Aufsatzsammlung; Beiträge
10. From the European Semester to the Recovery and Resilience Facility : Some Social Actors are (not) Resurfacing
abstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, major financial support has been pledged to Member States. This funding draws on the EU's multiannual financial framework and the ‘NextGenerationEU' with, at its core, the temporary ‘Recovery and Resilience Facility' (RRF). While some reporting templates have been newly invented, others are linked to the European Semester.This report examines how and why the Semester became part of the governance of the RRF. We also ask to what extent this new set-up has changed the power balance among key EU actors (for example, financial and economic actors versus institutional social affairs actors)? Drawing on extensive document analysis and 32 semi-structured elite interviews, the findings suggest that initially, due to the crisis (and desire for fast action), there was a serious risk that EU institutional social actors were losing the prominence they had previously earned. They gradually reclaimed their position as the immediacy of the crisis subsided and a longer-term focus emerged. EU civil servants also engaged with social partners on both sides of industry, even though it is questionable whether this consultation has been really meaningful.EU civil society organisations (CSOs) have been largely sidelined in the RRF process; and likewise in most Member States, consultation with domestic stakeholders (both social partners and CSOs) has remained insufficient by any standard. The European Parliament was reasonably successful in securing its substantive impact during the RRF negotiations. But it has since failed to insert itself into the approval and assessment procedures applicable to the EU's recovery programme
Vanhercke, Bart; Verdun, Amy;2022
Availability: Link Link
Citations: 5 (based on OpenCitations)
ORCID