Click on a term to reduce result list
The result list below will be reduced to the selected search terms. The terms are generated from the titles, abstracts and STW thesaurus of publications by the respective author.
202 records from EconBiz based on author Name
1. Proportional resource allocation in dynamic n-player Blotto games
Anbarcı, Nejat; Cingiz, Kutay; Ismail, Mehmet S.;2023
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link
2. "Storm autocracies" : islands as natural experiments
Rahman, Muhammad Habibur; Anbarcı, Nejat; Ulubaşoğlu, Mehmet Ali;2022
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link
Citations: 1 (based on OpenCitations)
3. Multi-battle n-player dynamic contests
Anbarcı, Nejat; Cingiz, Kutay; Ismail, Mehmet S.;2018
Type: Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature; Arbeitspapier; Working Paper;
Availability: Link Link
4. Designing practical and fair sequential team contests : the case of penalty shootouts
Anbarcı, Nejat; Sun, Ching-Jen; Ünver, M. Utku;2021
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link
Citations: 6 (based on OpenCitations)
5. Arbiter Assignment
abstractIn dispute resolution, arbitrator assignments are decentralized and they incorporate parties’preferences, in total contrast to referee assignments in sports. We suggest that there can begains (i) in dispute resolution from centralizing the allocation by bundling the newly arrivingcases, and (ii) in sports from incorporating teams’ preferences. To that end, we introduce aclass of Arbiter Assignment Problems where a set of matches (e.g., disputes or games), eachmade up of two agents, are to be assigned arbiters (e.g., arbitrators or referees). In this newset of problems, the question of how agents in a match should compromise becomes critical.To evaluate the value of an arbiter for a match, we introduce the (Rawlsian) notion of depth,defined as the arbiter’s worst position in the two agents’ rankings. Depth optimal assignmentsminimize depth over matches, and they are Pareto optimal. We first introduce and analyzedepth optimal (and fair) mechanisms. We then propose and study strategy-proof mechanisms
Afacan, Mustafa Oguz; Anbarci, Nejat; Kibris, Ozgur;2022
Availability: Link Link
Citations: 1 (based on OpenCitations)
6. Designing fair tiebreak mechanisms : the case of FIFA penalty shootouts
Anbarcı, Nejat; Sun, Ching-jen; Ünver, M. Utku;2015
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability:

7. Random-settlement arbitration and the generalized Nash solution : one-shot and infinite-horizon cases
Anbarcı, Nejat; Rong, Kang; Roy, Jaideep;2019
Type: Aufsatz in Zeitschrift; Article in journal;
Availability: Link
Citations: 4 (based on OpenCitations)
8. Designing fair tiebreak mechanisms : the case of FIFA penalty shootouts
Anbarcı, Nejat; Sun, Ching-Jen; Ünver, M. Utku;2014
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability: Link
9. The contractor game : a theoretical and experimental analysis
Anbarcı, Nejat; Feltovich, Nick; Gurdal, Mehmet Y.;2013
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability:

10. Formal and informal markets : a strategic and dynamic perspective
Anbarcı, Nejat; Gomis-Porqueras, Pedro; Pivato, Marcus;2013
Type: Arbeitspapier; Working Paper; Graue Literatur; Non-commercial literature;
Availability:
